I still believe those that have said over and over

I still believe those that have said over and over in the past couple of years that SFOR is a patent play, and not a revenue play. We all know how it worked out with "patent play" in the US due to Alice 101, crappy judges, and a lack-luster attorney performance in front of the crappy judges. Who knows, SFOR might have its chances again one day in court in the US. But, what are the thoughts on this board about international patents that SFOR is supposedly being granted this year? Is there money to be made with these international patents? Thanks!