Trump can mention it as long as he brings in a med

Quote:

---

Trump can mention it as long as he brings in a medical expert to explain the drug right after . That would help forget the hydroxy debacle

---

Reallypeople?

The way to "explain" a drug is by means of statistically-significant double-blinded clinical trials. Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 sequence. Remember ???

These are the rules of the game here in the USA as far as I know.

Or at least, this is what we were trying to do in CYDY and few other hundreds of companies vying for drug approvals.

The problem is, when the whole thing is bypassed as in:

Quote:

---

April 23: I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning?

---

Or the light (yes like in ultraviolet light) remark same day ....

Quote:

---

Taking hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 is safe and effective. “I happen to be a believer in hydroxy. I used it. I had no problem. I happen to be a believer,” Trump said on one occasion. “It doesn’t hurt people,” he commented on another.

---

He might be right, or not. But the way to find out is by Science.

Which one is going to be today ???

The problem is: after crying wolf some many times whatever is said will surely result in a controversy.

Heck, we are already having one here

We all lose when this happens. Our people, our investments, our faith.