Good point on Nader, CJ. While I and many others question some of his moves, decisions, public statements, etc., only a few seem to be bent on calling for his removal. That would be like changing managers in a pennant race in September. It would be great if message boards could demand or somehow provide transparency of paid posters to better assess the value of their contentions. Kinda like how the Cabinet appointees are supposed to be vetted for conflicts of interest, but rarely is, going way back. It's very healthy and provides badly needed perspective to discuss and evaluate the pros and cons of a key figure in a company we're invested in; it's unethical and borderline criminal to opine as a paid shill to defraud investors. Today's news shows he's got us on right track for approval, thru a phalanx of obstacles and opposition that few have dealt with. Good work, NP.