Somebody please reply directly to this guy with li
Post# of 155320
(Total Views: 782)
Posted On: 08/14/2020 8:16:06 PM
Somebody please reply directly to this guy with links that address his criticism. You can reply directly to his comment.
NY Times article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/health/cov...sContainer
Here is his negative comment.
" mockingjay
Boston
8m ago
Wow, out of 60 comments four of them are touting leronlimab and asking rhetorical questions: "The world has been waiting for a safe and effective treatment. It's Leromlimab!". None identify what the results are. Google searches show only that a study was released which seems to have failed its primary endpoint (for patient reported outcome) and did have a statistically significant impact (but not stated whether magnitude was clinically relevant) on improving a predictor-of-future-sickness score (but not stated if there were actual clinical outcomes, ie actually less future sickness).
I may not have all the data, but so far I am left with the suspicion that these are paid stock-pumpers, or true believers who are not very skeptical of prelim, unreviewed trial reports.
Regardless, I am sure that I will be flamed by either. Still, a plea: if you are for real, put data in your posts, not just assertions?"
NY Times article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/health/cov...sContainer
Here is his negative comment.
" mockingjay
Boston
8m ago
Wow, out of 60 comments four of them are touting leronlimab and asking rhetorical questions: "The world has been waiting for a safe and effective treatment. It's Leromlimab!". None identify what the results are. Google searches show only that a study was released which seems to have failed its primary endpoint (for patient reported outcome) and did have a statistically significant impact (but not stated whether magnitude was clinically relevant) on improving a predictor-of-future-sickness score (but not stated if there were actual clinical outcomes, ie actually less future sickness).
I may not have all the data, but so far I am left with the suspicion that these are paid stock-pumpers, or true believers who are not very skeptical of prelim, unreviewed trial reports.
Regardless, I am sure that I will be flamed by either. Still, a plea: if you are for real, put data in your posts, not just assertions?"
(1)
(0)