Regarding BP’s paper; I’m thinking that if BP
Post# of 148166
(Total Views: 572)
Posted On: 08/11/2020 12:04:32 PM
Regarding BP’s paper; I’m thinking that if BP isn’t happy for not being brought on Cytodyn’s board (it’s an assumption I’m making, we don’t know that as a fact) then it could be that he’s not in a rush to rebut the paper. Or else there has to be some explanation for this delay.
I think the initial submission to NEJM was screwed up by NP making public claims that the paper will get published on that journal (to this date I find hard to conceive how a PhD didn’t know that they couldn’t do this; if he did know and he still did it then it was a clear case of overselling, of misleading, of mismanaging).
Back to the point though: if Science or Nature paper was submitted only like a month ago (or even 2 months ago) then it could still take another 1-2 months before we see it published. And that’s assuming no games with BP delaying rebuttals and/or no games from the journal committee (which could easily also be influenced by Big Pharma network).
We’ll see. Hopefully by September but...I wouldn’t count on it.
I think the initial submission to NEJM was screwed up by NP making public claims that the paper will get published on that journal (to this date I find hard to conceive how a PhD didn’t know that they couldn’t do this; if he did know and he still did it then it was a clear case of overselling, of misleading, of mismanaging).
Back to the point though: if Science or Nature paper was submitted only like a month ago (or even 2 months ago) then it could still take another 1-2 months before we see it published. And that’s assuming no games with BP delaying rebuttals and/or no games from the journal committee (which could easily also be influenced by Big Pharma network).
We’ll see. Hopefully by September but...I wouldn’t count on it.
(0)
(1)CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼