Ray, I here you and always respect your point of v

Ray, I here you and always respect your point of view, but I am surprised that after all these years that you are cheerleading this update. Brett treats his shareholders like naughty children with his wording in the update. I for one never pursued information from any previous institutions or companies Nano had NDAs with and I’m sure it was only a very few who did - probably out of complete frustration after months with no news/updates from Nano. For Brett to use that as a possible reason for previous agreements to not have come to fruition is a total cop out. The truth is I am happy that we had an update, but the news is weak - the lab can’t do anything without grants which are competitive and time consuming to get - then still need to find a competent partner to actually make the tests - so in the short term Nano is dependent on one company making this happen - I hope they are not only familiar with Nano, but also Bretts idiosyncrasies- I simply can’t understand if Nano has this breakthrough technology why there is not more interest when the demand is so great for a fast accurate test! Look at the issues with testing that the governor of Ohio has had - unbelievable!