I understand completely Numbers. As a former sales
Post# of 148169
I get we have to tread carefully with FDA and I think NP is so right with that belief! But I do think that there is a lot of competition out there and physicians will chose products based on prior experience with drug or company AND to many doctors a Mab is a Mab. Differentiators like "Immune modulator", exact and NOVEL 3 prt MOA, 4 years of safety data.
Just take a look at media, FDA, NIH can't wrap their heads around any difference in MOA of the Mabs being touted- everyone is lumped together. This thinking WILL benefit Big Pharma- they are happy to be misunderstood especially if it means being on the winning team- there motto has always been Dr. keep me in your top 3 therapies for RA and now COVID.
At the end of the day, I am hopeful that our leadership anticipates and plans a real campaign for Leronlimab and doesn't simply EXPECT overnight success with out any effort or expense. That might have worked with approval 3 months ago- competitor landscape has changed, we need to evolve as well. I am all in, very Long and ready to start developing key opinion leaders on go!