I think it was a good call (except for the Q&A: th
Post# of 148169
Although many of us (myself included) were hopeful that we would get results, we were told that we would get an update and that is what we got.
I still think that the lending institution had more revealed to them (rough data) than was revealed to us. It would have to be. Institutions don't lend money on a wing and a prayer. I don't mind that NP is holding information until it is complete and all the t's are crossed and i's are dotted. That is as it should be.
A couple things confused me and maybe someone could explain. Dr. Jay said the SAEs are an endpoint and then I believe someone asked if they could be added as an endpoint (as that is what Regeneron did?) I think NP's answer to that was a little muddled or muffled. Does anyone have an idea about this?
Was our manufacturing capacity reduced? That part was also unclear. I think mostly because the questioners were all so unclear and long-winded. The manufacturing piece is the part I understand the least. When we get approval, won't the government step in and make sure enough gets made? The letter from the DOJ?
GLTA. I think we are on track to something great. I don't mind waiting 10 days for something great.