For those new, the following is extremely heavy on the sarcasm.
The last few weeks seems to have proven what so many on this board keep trying to tell us, there is absolutely no nefarious doings being played by outsiders (whether MMs, hedge funds, cabals, major trading groups, whomever)against IPIX. There are very few shorts and for certain no naked shorts (of course, if there were wouldn't the "naked" mean they couldn't be traced?). What we have is a perfectly trading market adhering to all the rules put in place by the SEC. If any of the named bodies above were fiddling with the trading, we certainly would be protected by FINRA who would throw the top management of firms doing such brazen thievery in jail (or more likely give them a a token slap on the wrist, tell them not to do it again, and let them keep about 95% or more of the money they filched from honest investors with their illegal dealings.
Now how can I support such belief in the system such that it must have been bad company news that sent the stock price dropping? See the following:
1- B found to be one of only a handful of drugs found to be lethal to CV19 via computerized model of over 11K drugs.
2- Further testing by a govt lab showed B exceptionally effective in killing CV in a petri dish.
3- Further testing showed B killed 85% of CV19 within an hour against an extremely tough strain of CV19 in human kidney tissue
4- Further testing showed B killed 97% of CV19 in human lung tissue.
5- RBL that did the lab work on the human lung tissue (and had worked with B since 2018 against antifungals was so impressed with the results that they co-authored a grant request to do a PAN-CORONA investigation of B.
6- Both RBLs plan on publishing peer review articles of the work and findings they did on B because the results were so stellar.
7- Further testing at RBL showed at the lowest dose given to date B still showed a 90% effective kill rate of CV19 whereas Remsdesivir only showed a 50% kill rate. Thus, the SI (selectivity index), which is a great aid in determining those drugs with the highest expected success rate against CV19 and the safest, should be MUCH higher for B compared to Rems....
8- Testing results listed above shows that Brilacidin should kick Rems.... ass in a head to head trial.
9- Govt has already committed to a $2B order for Rems.... product. What would they commit to a product that wipes out Rems...?
10- Grant request was submitted in early July and keeps getting closer and closer to being announced.
11- B's 3 MOAs against CV19 gives it a Billion X Billion greater chance of viruses not being able to develop a resistance to it compared to all other drugs that have only a single MOA to kill CV19.
12- B's 3-in-1 properties of being antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and having strong immunotherapeutic properties makes it able to attack the results of the CV19 such as lung cell death, brain swelling, kidney disruption, bowel disruption, cytokine storm, etc while most every other drug just is able to try and kill the virus to a far, far less greater effect than B.
13- B does not alter the DNA of the human genome. Most other major drugs being discussed, especially for developing a virus, affect the DNA in a recombinant or like manner and to date NO DRUG HAS EVER BEEN tested to see what the long term effects on humans is of these drugs. But then, who doesn't mind for-profit companies playing with the human genome?
I think the above has pretty much made my point. Why wouldn't all stock holders have realized the price would plummet of our shares when we have been faced with the above body of news? Who would ever have thought such mind boggling success after success for B against CV wouldn't have set BIG MEDICINE on its ear (or maybe that is one of the problems, BIG MEDICINE realizes what a threat Brilacidin brings to SO MANY of their drugs which don't cure anything, just treats conditions for life long needed therapies off of which they happen to make a fortune? Who wouldn't have expected a major drop almost daily at the last second and a major drop right out of the gate in the first 15 minutes of trading by the MMs?
Yes, I now realize I should pity all us dumb long stock holders for the rose-colored glasses we have been wearing. Even a fool could look at the data above and see we were headed in an ever increasing spiral down in share price.
And if you believe that, you are most likely profiting from this unconscionable attack on IPIX. Not blaming the traders that buy and sell daily, that is all part of the game. But the larger game is being allowed by the regulatory bodies IMO and though they know how to fix the system the big money says to keep their hands off - and so they do.
The last few weeks seems to have proven what so many on this board keep trying to tell us, there is absolutely no nefarious doings being played by outsiders (whether MMs, hedge funds, cabals, major trading groups, whomever)against IPIX. There are very few shorts and for certain no naked shorts (of course, if there were wouldn't the "naked" mean they couldn't be traced?). What we have is a perfectly trading market adhering to all the rules put in place by the SEC. If any of the named bodies above were fiddling with the trading, we certainly would be protected by FINRA who would throw the top management of firms doing such brazen thievery in jail (or more likely give them a a token slap on the wrist, tell them not to do it again, and let them keep about 95% or more of the money they filched from honest investors with their illegal dealings.
Now how can I support such belief in the system such that it must have been bad company news that sent the stock price dropping? See the following:
1- B found to be one of only a handful of drugs found to be lethal to CV19 via computerized model of over 11K drugs.
2- Further testing by a govt lab showed B exceptionally effective in killing CV in a petri dish.
3- Further testing showed B killed 85% of CV19 within an hour against an extremely tough strain of CV19 in human kidney tissue
4- Further testing showed B killed 97% of CV19 in human lung tissue.
5- RBL that did the lab work on the human lung tissue (and had worked with B since 2018 against antifungals was so impressed with the results that they co-authored a grant request to do a PAN-CORONA investigation of B.
6- Both RBLs plan on publishing peer review articles of the work and findings they did on B because the results were so stellar.
7- Further testing at RBL showed at the lowest dose given to date B still showed a 90% effective kill rate of CV19 whereas Remsdesivir only showed a 50% kill rate. Thus, the SI (selectivity index), which is a great aid in determining those drugs with the highest expected success rate against CV19 and the safest, should be MUCH higher for B compared to Rems....
8- Testing results listed above shows that Brilacidin should kick Rems.... ass in a head to head trial.
9- Govt has already committed to a $2B order for Rems.... product. What would they commit to a product that wipes out Rems...?
10- Grant request was submitted in early July and keeps getting closer and closer to being announced.
11- B's 3 MOAs against CV19 gives it a Billion X Billion greater chance of viruses not being able to develop a resistance to it compared to all other drugs that have only a single MOA to kill CV19.
12- B's 3-in-1 properties of being antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and having strong immunotherapeutic properties makes it able to attack the results of the CV19 such as lung cell death, brain swelling, kidney disruption, bowel disruption, cytokine storm, etc while most every other drug just is able to try and kill the virus to a far, far less greater effect than B.
13- B does not alter the DNA of the human genome. Most other major drugs being discussed, especially for developing a virus, affect the DNA in a recombinant or like manner and to date NO DRUG HAS EVER BEEN tested to see what the long term effects on humans is of these drugs. But then, who doesn't mind for-profit companies playing with the human genome?
I think the above has pretty much made my point. Why wouldn't all stock holders have realized the price would plummet of our shares when we have been faced with the above body of news? Who would ever have thought such mind boggling success after success for B against CV wouldn't have set BIG MEDICINE on its ear (or maybe that is one of the problems, BIG MEDICINE realizes what a threat Brilacidin brings to SO MANY of their drugs which don't cure anything, just treats conditions for life long needed therapies off of which they happen to make a fortune? Who wouldn't have expected a major drop almost daily at the last second and a major drop right out of the gate in the first 15 minutes of trading by the MMs?
Yes, I now realize I should pity all us dumb long stock holders for the rose-colored glasses we have been wearing. Even a fool could look at the data above and see we were headed in an ever increasing spiral down in share price.
And if you believe that, you are most likely profiting from this unconscionable attack on IPIX. Not blaming the traders that buy and sell daily, that is all part of the game. But the larger game is being allowed by the regulatory bodies IMO and though they know how to fix the system the big money says to keep their hands off - and so they do.
15
