That's awesome, nice job! If they get the infor
Post# of 85468
If they get the information right for this article, that would be a plus. Doesn't seem like the proper order for an investor to have to tell the one (supposedly) providing the information that they are flawed.
Now they are changing around their article based on what someone told them in an email. Thankfully, the information emailed to them was correct. But what happens when the bashers email them information that is not correct? Will they update their article(s) for them as well?
I would still shy away from getting information from them, given their track record and haphazard style of formulating articles.