>> Nov 17 2011 Iron Ore Market Up 3rd Shipment Contract To Be Executed Quote:
"CWRN The recent down trend in Spot Pricing for the China Sea Borne Trade for Iron Ore caused some companies to hold off on shipping, (including CWRN) this led to a reduction in immediate raw material stocks for some steel makers. Over the last 12 consecutive trading days, the market has rebounded and some Iron Ore Sellers are now executing sales contracts . The Company has been trucking materials to the Pacific Ocean Port of Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico and has stepped up trucking by adding more trucks. The Company sells Raw Crude Iron Ore based on the Platt's Steel Index at landing on a 6 day average price, 3 days prior and 3 days after landing with a negotiated discount off Spot Pricing. It is anticipated that the landing price will be somewhat higher than the contract signing day Spot Market Price."
"Shipping Update : Bulk vessel shipping Cost is expected to be $9.00 cheaper per wet metric ton than the August Shipment Cost, the Company is now in the market for the 3rd shipment dry bulk carrier in the HandyMax size range, 40 to 45 thousand metric tons." [emphasis added].
The above was part of the Nov 17 PR forecasting this last ship.
Note : re full disclosure-this PR and the previous PR Sept 29 or 30 forecast this 3rd ship-and the 3rd ship was in the 40-45k range forecast by the Nov 17 PR,as the ship held ca 43800 tons of ore.
So the pics merely show the process of the loading that was already PR'd and that is not material info-its more at a human interest story. I wasn't even aware of and didn't even read the Walker article til a couple days ago because I have never acted on any supposed insider knowledge I might have had,and I deny having, and Bob has been careful re that-and I have not been trading this and haven't been able to for over 9 months due to broker restrictions.
The shout of insider knowledge is part of the chill tactic executed by this raiding cult to target all dd as insider info while they automatically reject all public sources of info,including PR's. Again this is the blatant cult practice of trying to silence all opposition so they have free reign to control the boards and peoples minds so they can defraud longs on behalf of their alleged employers.
In filing their complaints against CWRN, as noted by somebody in an ihub post today, and no doubt against Rocket and I as some of the recipients of the pics to pass onto the boards,they are again doing exactly what the cults do-eliminating all opposition any way they can so they can steal from longs as part of their obvious intent to defraud longs on behalf of an alleged hedge fund which has an alleged large position of naked shorts they need to cover.
When asked why they were targeting CWRN when there were ca 7 other stocks named in the sec complaint,they tellingly answered, "because the other stocks are already dead in the water at .0001"(to paraphrase). That is, the other stocks are at .0001, and so are not a threat to any illegal naked short positions. They shouted newsletter promo when they saw CWRN might actually be 1 of very few penny companies to actually make it. Note CWRN is 1 of only 2 stocks in the recent complaints against ca 8 companies in which sec doesn't ask any officer or director to step down,which indicates sec has less on CWRN than the the other stocks targeted.
Allegedly some of these people are informants for the sec,working both sides of the table. Allegedly their alleged employer (who should be targeted by regulatory agencies for their illegal shorting and intent to defraud) needs to cover their illegal naked short position so they allegedly inform the sec to target the company,e.g as per the sting operation,which sounds like fraudulent collusion to me-and some on this board have indicated there may be a sting operation against the sec by the fbi etc-if we are to have equal application of the law,so longs are not deprived of life,liberty and property by this fraudulent attack/alleged collusion by shorters/demoters.
They then allegedly obtain advance notice of complaints via somebody in the sec allegedly illegally leaking this info to them against the companies which have a large naked short position against them-so they can further plan for and execute the raid against the company to defraud longs. On hindsight I've seen the positioning for this raid developing over the months.They even arrogantly removed all the stickies and replaced them with redundant links to the complaints before we were finally able to get an equal number of stickies for both sides. Allegedly some work for a hedge fund with a large naked short position that needs to crash the pps so they can cover their illegal naked shorts by buying shares at a literal steal.
Shorters in general and I wouldn't be surprised at all if that included this group raiding CWRN now have been stealing from longs for a long time,so keep track of you resultant losses. And even destroying the penny market since late 2009,not to mention that congressional investigations showed the connection between shorting and the great recession-so shorting was prohibited in certain financial sectors for a while. Some countries don't even allow shorting I've read.
One apparent member of this raiding group came on the CWRN stock board immediately after the ce, shouting "revocation" and "suspension". Why would there be revocation etc when otc themselves told me there wasn't any evidence of fraud-they simply thought there had been a newsletter promo because pps doesn't usually rise like that without a promo.
OTC was not aware the pps had been severely undervalued by the "unprecedented"(itmd etc) etmm etc shorting/manipulation,which they probably were not aware of. This unconstitutional unequal application of the law against promoters while demoters are given free reign and are not regulated seems to exist across the board and is ripe for challenge.
So shorters already fraudulently shouted newsletter promotion to otc to get the ce slapped when ,as per 1-31-11 PR etc, there was no newsletter promotion.
So via the ce they have already been stealing from longs ever since Jan 2011-and before then etmm was engaged in what many called an "unprecedented" campaign of shorting against CWRN it seemed ever since 1st news of investor financing ca June 2011 until the trade for trade instituted in March 2011 by dtc supposedly stopped further illegal naked shorting.
The reported finra "short volume"(the exact descriptive words used by finra and as per finra itself that doesn't include non tape transactions and unreported transactions nor the dozen ways mm's have to hide true shorts-see posts by 4kids9pets) was in the range of 65-95% for months in fall of 2010. Those familiar w illegal naked shorting say this is evidence of a large naked short position. Apparently called naked short because the shorters didn't even have the shares-didn't even borrow shares -they sold shares they didn't even have? -and they apparently don't report the income to the IRS,since the naked shorting is illegal.
Those who are more familiar w this practice can amplify/explain further. So keep track of your losses resulting from these frauds by shorters and note evidences of these things which we will need if the SEC looks into full disclosure re CWRN.
