So SEC attorney Perkins, who doubles as DECN's pro
Post# of 11802
1. why would a lawyer lie under oath, get caught in the lies (primarily by DECN Shareholder Letter #1) and then lie again, only to be caught. Aren't these ethical violations? And for all I know Perkins posts on iHub because he sure sounds like those gavonnes.
2. and if both of the master documents the SEC uses to explain why DECN was suspended are now fruit of a poisoned tree, what does the SEC have to explain the suspension -- only iHub cabal lies?