Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Message Board

As an academic exercise this morning I ventured ov

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 9144
(Total Views: 458)
Posted On: 07/17/2020 12:53:22 PM
Posted By: mitstevfel
As an academic exercise this morning I ventured over to "that board that shall not be named" and read the nonsense that demonstrated a marked lack of comprehension of both the NanoLogix technology and the related PowerPoint presentation by Drs. Faro and Rogers on the NanoLogix Rapid Viral Assay:

A poster cited one slide stating the shortcomings of existing tests related to re-positives (present with PCR registering the presence of particles that are non-infectious remnants of Coronavirus, as occurred in a reported Korean study with hundreds of prior-positive and previously quarantined individuals later testing as positive due to dead viral remnants) as if the slide indicated that the NanoLogix technology had that shortcoming. They cited two other statements as negatives that were again problems with currently in-use technologies and were actually positives when it comes to the NanoLogix technology. Then, the main maligner of NanoLogix on that site declared their "1,000% agreement with that poster. What absolute nonsense, lack of understanding and idiocy they demonstrate with their postings.

Thankfully, there is little of that present on this board and I have to thank Microcaps for that to a huge degree.

The thrust of the PowerPoint on the NanoLogix website is easy to understand. The existing tests are terrible, they are not meant for diagnostics and are an extreme example of lab research technology being misapplied.

For those who tend to simply accept posters opinions I recommend a visit to the NanoLogix website and a small amount of study of the PowerPoint there.

Scott



(5)
(1)




Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us