As an academic exercise this morning I ventured ov
Post# of 9144
(Total Views: 457)
Posted On: 07/17/2020 12:53:22 PM
As an academic exercise this morning I ventured over to "that board that shall not be named" and read the nonsense that demonstrated a marked lack of comprehension of both the NanoLogix technology and the related PowerPoint presentation by Drs. Faro and Rogers on the NanoLogix Rapid Viral Assay:
A poster cited one slide stating the shortcomings of existing tests related to re-positives (present with PCR registering the presence of particles that are non-infectious remnants of Coronavirus, as occurred in a reported Korean study with hundreds of prior-positive and previously quarantined individuals later testing as positive due to dead viral remnants) as if the slide indicated that the NanoLogix technology had that shortcoming. They cited two other statements as negatives that were again problems with currently in-use technologies and were actually positives when it comes to the NanoLogix technology. Then, the main maligner of NanoLogix on that site declared their "1,000% agreement with that poster. What absolute nonsense, lack of understanding and idiocy they demonstrate with their postings.
Thankfully, there is little of that present on this board and I have to thank Microcaps for that to a huge degree.
The thrust of the PowerPoint on the NanoLogix website is easy to understand. The existing tests are terrible, they are not meant for diagnostics and are an extreme example of lab research technology being misapplied.
For those who tend to simply accept posters opinions I recommend a visit to the NanoLogix website and a small amount of study of the PowerPoint there.
Scott
A poster cited one slide stating the shortcomings of existing tests related to re-positives (present with PCR registering the presence of particles that are non-infectious remnants of Coronavirus, as occurred in a reported Korean study with hundreds of prior-positive and previously quarantined individuals later testing as positive due to dead viral remnants) as if the slide indicated that the NanoLogix technology had that shortcoming. They cited two other statements as negatives that were again problems with currently in-use technologies and were actually positives when it comes to the NanoLogix technology. Then, the main maligner of NanoLogix on that site declared their "1,000% agreement with that poster. What absolute nonsense, lack of understanding and idiocy they demonstrate with their postings.
Thankfully, there is little of that present on this board and I have to thank Microcaps for that to a huge degree.
The thrust of the PowerPoint on the NanoLogix website is easy to understand. The existing tests are terrible, they are not meant for diagnostics and are an extreme example of lab research technology being misapplied.
For those who tend to simply accept posters opinions I recommend a visit to the NanoLogix website and a small amount of study of the PowerPoint there.
Scott
(5)
(1)