TechGuru, I am not aware of that (I don’t know t

TechGuru, I am not aware of that (I don’t know the history of the company well). If that’s indeed the case, then yes, absolutely, NP should be recognized for it. My main point is that NP is not always clear in his communications and as a CEO and front-face of a mid cap company he should be.

There’s been quite a few responses to my post (some disrespectful but...whatever) and in one of those someone suggests that we need a CEO who will fight the system. Do we? Why not be more conventional by having a well spoken CEO? Playing along doesn’t mean we’re selling off. Efficacy of drug against the various indications is what’s gonna decide the price of this company. Not whether the CEO has a fighting spirit. The fighting spirit did come handy, as TechGuru mentioned above; if it wasn’t for NP we probably wouldn’t have been here in the first place. But now we are; and the needs are different. We need someone we’ll spoken who leaves no room for misinterpretations.

As a Cytodyn investor I’m concerned that if NP appears on a conservative, large network (Fox or whatever) he might be “attacked” by a journalist. It sounds a bit far fetched but I wouldn’t be surprised if I saw it. And then, if that happened, I would have little confidence in him being able to respond to that pressure.

I’m being devil’s advocate but...I find the points I make to be valid. Or at least up for discussion.

Alekos