Thanks and understood 100%, my reply(to boy) was b

Thanks and understood 100%, my reply(to boy) was based on my opinion that anyone, long term shareholder or board member here understood my post and what I was implying and referring to as Medicare “filings” application approval and Docs thumbs up.. that is where I used semantics and boy used a pretty straight forward post by me to spin it into something else... really don’t think that is argumentative. I am pretty hip on what is happening here as well and my/our investment is going, and I side on the side of caution with a timetable.. and my post explained my thoughts on assumptions and how they can have a negative short term effect on the PPS, that was really all I was stating, thanks. One second closer!!!