For the Philippine paper they're inaccurate I'm ho
Post# of 148165
49 patients in 2 and 2b/3 study for m2m and s/c respectively. Sentence doesn't make sense
Then it discusses mortality as primary end point for the 49 patients. Some of which they just said belong to the m#m group.
This reads like someone saw one of the earlier CC's and got the numbers/presentation twisted