Certainly, the 1-month estimate is not credible.Ju

Quote:

---

Certainly, the 1-month estimate is not credible.

---

Just to be clear, the dates in the catalyst list are only guesses regarding when an event might take place.

Also, if I may, allow me to explain the reasoning behind FDA Ruling Combo HIV being identified as 1-6 months.

A while back, I posted that the administration was desperate to get Americans back to work. In my opinion, the whole remdesivir debacle is emblematic of this no-holds-barred approach to coaxing the general public to work again.

Back then, I floated the notion that the administration might want to 'sell' leronlimab to the public by saying that it was "FDA Approved" drug with no serious adverse side effects. And if that were deemed important, they might tell the FDA to fast track approval so that they could tell that story to the public.

For that reason, and that reason alone, I expanded the near term time frame of that catalyst entry to 1-6 months.