CDiddy, Yes, agree with you, others have to be
Post# of 148293
Yes, agree with you, others have to be held to the same standards. That is what I am unhappy about.
They get open-label trials and approval for emergency. Guidelines from NIH:
https://covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/whats-new/
From CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp...ients.html
Quote:
Remdesivir:
On the basis of preliminary clinical trial data, the Panel recommends the investigational antiviral agent remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with severe disease , defined as SpO2 ≤94% on ambient air (at sea level), requiring supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (BI).
Remdesivir is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); however, it is available through an FDA emergency use authorization for the treatment of hospitalized adults and children with COVID-19. Remdesivir is also being investigated in clinical trials, and it is available through an emergency access program for children and pregnant patients.
The Panel does not recommend Remdesivir for the treatment of mild or moderate COVID-19 outside the setting of a clinical trial (AIII).
So, basically, go ahead help yourselves, even if it is not approved by FDA... hell use it !!!, why not ?
And they keep on doing open-label trials ...
If you ask me, our results are much better and ... NO emergency use. NO approval, NO official endorsements (like the ones above) NO favorable mentions in the oval office ...
You (CYDY) , you do double blinded trials ... P2 and then P3 the whole enchillada and then come and report to me latter