There are two issues -- the claim that the virus w
Post# of 702
One issue probably not being true does not mean the the other is not true.
People seem to be conflating them -- saying either:
1) It was a genetically engineered virus that was released from the lab;
or
2) It's a natural virus from the wet market.
There is a third choice:
3) It's a natural virus that was released from the lab
The fourth combination is NOT possible -- "it's an engineered virus, infecting humans from the wet market" -- because if it's engineered, it wouldn't be found in animals for natural transmission to humans.