Why are you posting something from someone with no
Post# of 126951
(Total Views: 209)
Posted On: 05/08/2020 8:09:11 AM
Re: energy_wave #37900
Why are you posting something from someone with no credibility in response to being called out for posting an inaccurate attribution?
No, CBS was not 'caught'. Place Fox News or CNN cameras outside the clinic and they would have shot the same footage.
CBS News edits testing story after Project Veritas exposes clinic's line-stuffing ploy
Flynn flat out lied about his contact with a Russian, as did several others in the Trump administration. Why would they do that?
Hannity, as usual, is simply and completely full of shit.
Trump Says He Fired Michael Flynn ‘Because He Lied’ to F.B.I.
By Maggie Haberman, Michael S. Schmidt and Michael D. Shear
Dec. 2, 2017
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/politic...flynn.html
President Trump said on Saturday that he had fired Michael T. Flynn, his first national security adviser, because he lied not just to the vice president but also to the F.B.I.
The president has long asserted that he fired Mr. Flynn in February, less than a month after he took office, because Mr. Flynn had lied to Vice President Mike Pence over whether he talked with the Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak, about sanctions imposed on Russia by President Barack Obama.
The government’s 20-page brief is not an honest document—perhaps the reason that it is signed only by Timothy Shea, the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia—and not a single one of the career prosecutors who worked on the case. That may also be the reason why Brandon Van Grack, the prosecutor who has worked the case from the beginning, moved to withdraw .. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/68...istant.pdf .. from the case entirely just hours before the Justice Department filed its motion.
The brief’s account of the history of the Flynn case is not accurate, its account of the government’s own conduct equally flawed. And it all leads up to a conclusion so obviously wrong that one does not need to know anything about counterintelligence to see through it: that there is no reasonable basis even to interview a senior government official when that person has engaged over sanctions imposed against a foreign adversary government that interfered in an election—and who subsequently lied to the vice president of the United States about the substance of his conversation with an agent of that government.
Based on this position, the Justice Department today took an even greater leap: that it is perfectly legal for the official, if interviewed under these circumstances, to lie through his teeth repeatedly to the FBI agents who show up to interview him.
No, CBS was not 'caught'. Place Fox News or CNN cameras outside the clinic and they would have shot the same footage.
CBS News edits testing story after Project Veritas exposes clinic's line-stuffing ploy
Flynn flat out lied about his contact with a Russian, as did several others in the Trump administration. Why would they do that?
Hannity, as usual, is simply and completely full of shit.
Trump Says He Fired Michael Flynn ‘Because He Lied’ to F.B.I.
By Maggie Haberman, Michael S. Schmidt and Michael D. Shear
Dec. 2, 2017
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/politic...flynn.html
President Trump said on Saturday that he had fired Michael T. Flynn, his first national security adviser, because he lied not just to the vice president but also to the F.B.I.
The president has long asserted that he fired Mr. Flynn in February, less than a month after he took office, because Mr. Flynn had lied to Vice President Mike Pence over whether he talked with the Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak, about sanctions imposed on Russia by President Barack Obama.
The government’s 20-page brief is not an honest document—perhaps the reason that it is signed only by Timothy Shea, the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia—and not a single one of the career prosecutors who worked on the case. That may also be the reason why Brandon Van Grack, the prosecutor who has worked the case from the beginning, moved to withdraw .. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/68...istant.pdf .. from the case entirely just hours before the Justice Department filed its motion.
The brief’s account of the history of the Flynn case is not accurate, its account of the government’s own conduct equally flawed. And it all leads up to a conclusion so obviously wrong that one does not need to know anything about counterintelligence to see through it: that there is no reasonable basis even to interview a senior government official when that person has engaged over sanctions imposed against a foreign adversary government that interfered in an election—and who subsequently lied to the vice president of the United States about the substance of his conversation with an agent of that government.
Based on this position, the Justice Department today took an even greater leap: that it is perfectly legal for the official, if interviewed under these circumstances, to lie through his teeth repeatedly to the FBI agents who show up to interview him.
(0)
(0)