Yes, given the context, Montefiore was the correct
Post# of 148181
(Total Views: 509)
Posted On: 05/03/2020 9:20:58 PM
Re: craigakess #31725
Yes, given the context, Montefiore was the correct reference but he did say "monte" so I quoted as spoken.
Nature is https://www.nature.com/ I believe. He did later say it could be one of the derivative issues as well (guessing Nature Cell Biology or the like).
Really worth listening to. He has seen the paper and spoken with NP and Dr. Bruce Patterson but would only reveal so much for obvious reasons.
Also, check the comments for the livestream as well...Dr. Yo was interacting with people about leronlimab throughout which is where I saw him suggesting Dr. Bruce Paterson's RANTES discovery is worthy of a Nobel Prize.
Nature is https://www.nature.com/ I believe. He did later say it could be one of the derivative issues as well (guessing Nature Cell Biology or the like).
Really worth listening to. He has seen the paper and spoken with NP and Dr. Bruce Patterson but would only reveal so much for obvious reasons.
Also, check the comments for the livestream as well...Dr. Yo was interacting with people about leronlimab throughout which is where I saw him suggesting Dr. Bruce Paterson's RANTES discovery is worthy of a Nobel Prize.
(0)
(0)CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼