I’ve been anxiously waiting for the Alice 101 ni
Post# of 82690
(Total Views: 605)
Posted On: 05/02/2020 11:34:49 PM
I’ve been anxiously waiting for the Alice 101 nightmare fix, which we have two fixes in play: 1) Congress Bipartisan Bill that fixes Alice 101 and 2) Continuation Patents! IMHO #2 will take place before Congress can get back to proper legislation again! The 10k does provide light on this major issue! If that had never been done, we would have big revs coming in now already and would have started at least in 2018! DUO was getting ready to settle until SA moved the case to CA from VA and used their family tied 9th District Judge and FED Appellate upheld using a BS rule that allows them not to state the reason – that’s such BULLSH*T!
OOB/MFA is being used HUGE throughout the entire IT Industry/Cyber Ecosystem! And….PUSH….is a major process type being used, which is our friggin IP! I use with all my Finance and Broker accounts now! We also have DoD contracting companies using now, which I noticed starting in MAR….hmmm!
We also have Outstanding Keystroke Encryption IP and why I use it on my devices! I think some would be surprised to see how many SFOR investors still have NOT purchased and loaded what they’re invested in, just mind boggling! GuardedID and MobileTrust are outstanding counters to the cyber bad guys – keylogging, etc.! I am glad to see big guns FINALLY stepped up to license and use SFOR KE IP! It is on the customers and their timelines for implementation – that’s when we finally get paid. The inked deals are still good with unfortunate implementation delays and I am sure the CCP VIRUS PANDEMIC has added delays! However, MK said he would NOT RS unless the company was in a better position, which means sustainability post-split! I pray and hope that is the case and we will find out soon enough starting o/a mid-18 MAY. Depends on when FINRA approves the RS. I hate we will get a high RS – 1:500 this month – I have hope we can sustain post-split. We have large signed deals on the verge of ecosystem implementation this time! This was not the case with previous splits! I do feel for the honest true longs that went thru previous splits!
From the 10k ref OOB/MFA patents:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/12855...or_10k.htm
Our patent attorneys filed our fourth “, fifth and sixth Out of Band” continuation patents. We currently have three patents granted to us for Out-of-Band ProtectID® (Patent Nos.: 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701).
On December 1, 2017, The United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion in the StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. SecureAuth Corp. case, which invalidated claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701 under 35 U.S.C. §101. We strongly disagreed with the Court’s decision and an appeal was filed by our attorney in July 2019. In October 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States denied our petition for a writ of certiorari in StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. SecureAuth Corp (19-103). Thus, the claims asserted against SecureAuth in the Central District of California, case no. 2:17-cv-04314-JAK-SK, remain invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101. Our three patents contain a total of 108 claims, 43 claims were deemed invalid, however, 65 claims are still valid . Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, our Protect ID® products still retain patent protection and our management intends to further expand those protections with new patents in the coming months . In the meantime, we continue to monitor the Federal Courts because there are several cases (i.e. Berkheimer v. HP), whereby a decision for Berkheimer could change the appellate landscape for 101 motion cases. Additionally, and even more exciting is that U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), along with several other Senators have released a bipartisan, bicameral draft bill that would reform Section 101 of the Patent Act.
OOB/MFA is being used HUGE throughout the entire IT Industry/Cyber Ecosystem! And….PUSH….is a major process type being used, which is our friggin IP! I use with all my Finance and Broker accounts now! We also have DoD contracting companies using now, which I noticed starting in MAR….hmmm!
We also have Outstanding Keystroke Encryption IP and why I use it on my devices! I think some would be surprised to see how many SFOR investors still have NOT purchased and loaded what they’re invested in, just mind boggling! GuardedID and MobileTrust are outstanding counters to the cyber bad guys – keylogging, etc.! I am glad to see big guns FINALLY stepped up to license and use SFOR KE IP! It is on the customers and their timelines for implementation – that’s when we finally get paid. The inked deals are still good with unfortunate implementation delays and I am sure the CCP VIRUS PANDEMIC has added delays! However, MK said he would NOT RS unless the company was in a better position, which means sustainability post-split! I pray and hope that is the case and we will find out soon enough starting o/a mid-18 MAY. Depends on when FINRA approves the RS. I hate we will get a high RS – 1:500 this month – I have hope we can sustain post-split. We have large signed deals on the verge of ecosystem implementation this time! This was not the case with previous splits! I do feel for the honest true longs that went thru previous splits!
From the 10k ref OOB/MFA patents:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/12855...or_10k.htm
Our patent attorneys filed our fourth “, fifth and sixth Out of Band” continuation patents. We currently have three patents granted to us for Out-of-Band ProtectID® (Patent Nos.: 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701).
On December 1, 2017, The United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion in the StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. SecureAuth Corp. case, which invalidated claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701 under 35 U.S.C. §101. We strongly disagreed with the Court’s decision and an appeal was filed by our attorney in July 2019. In October 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States denied our petition for a writ of certiorari in StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. SecureAuth Corp (19-103). Thus, the claims asserted against SecureAuth in the Central District of California, case no. 2:17-cv-04314-JAK-SK, remain invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101. Our three patents contain a total of 108 claims, 43 claims were deemed invalid, however, 65 claims are still valid . Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, our Protect ID® products still retain patent protection and our management intends to further expand those protections with new patents in the coming months . In the meantime, we continue to monitor the Federal Courts because there are several cases (i.e. Berkheimer v. HP), whereby a decision for Berkheimer could change the appellate landscape for 101 motion cases. Additionally, and even more exciting is that U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), along with several other Senators have released a bipartisan, bicameral draft bill that would reform Section 101 of the Patent Act.
(10)
(0)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
$SFOR/SFT and BSAFE/BST STRONG!!!!
Parent: https://www.strikeforcetech.com
Subsidiary: https://www.blocksafetech.com
Parent: https://www.strikeforcetech.com
Subsidiary: https://www.blocksafetech.com