That is not true because the SEC is most certainly
Post# of 11803
(Total Views: 788)
Posted On: 04/24/2020 12:09:23 PM
That is not true because the SEC is most certainly in communication with the FDA. At first I thought this antibody testing, which kind of was plausible based on the glucose strips. When it was apparent that the test submitted was to determine whether a person has the virus it became clearer that this Company had no intention of getting an FDA approval. The Company was/is just going through the motions to get the stock price higher.
Noone in pharma thinks approval has one iota of a chance. Where are trial results? This test takes 15 seconds, it should be easy to have test results already. Every major institution would be lining up to be the one to validate this if it were possible.
Look at your past postings, where is the victory sett; element from J&J, the white labels from big box stores or the merger with the hedge fund that purchased LifeScan. All gamesmanship to get stock buying.
Longs are porked here, parked like well done pork chops left on the grill to long.
The press releases were pure gamesmanship. There is not one legitimate Company putting out the most hyped up press releases I have ever witnessed.
Noone in pharma thinks approval has one iota of a chance. Where are trial results? This test takes 15 seconds, it should be easy to have test results already. Every major institution would be lining up to be the one to validate this if it were possible.
Look at your past postings, where is the victory sett; element from J&J, the white labels from big box stores or the merger with the hedge fund that purchased LifeScan. All gamesmanship to get stock buying.
Longs are porked here, parked like well done pork chops left on the grill to long.
The press releases were pure gamesmanship. There is not one legitimate Company putting out the most hyped up press releases I have ever witnessed.
(1)
(1)