Well, I guess what you said could be considered a

Well, I guess what you said could be considered a rebuttal to my brilliant post but, quite frankly, I'm a little bit disappointed with your flimsy attempt. I was expecting that you were going to come up with some major scientific study showing me, as well as everyone else here, just how irrelevant higher lung capacity and stronger muscles are in a woman's sporting events and then you would take the report and shove it straight up my posterior*. Instead, you completely ignored that and started a floppin' your gums/fingers about trannys being an infinitesimal part of any student body and like the general population, relatively few will become competitive athletes. Law of averages.......... Yes, I do agree that they are few and even fewer of them will be lining up to get on to some kind of sports team. However, regardless as to whether few or many, peckerless males are not girls and never will be. Well, I guess they can be in Librul Loonville.

It was good seeing that old Psychology Today article again. You have pulled that old crock of squat out at least two other times in the past and its always a hoot to read.. I had a subscription to that magazine back in the 70's but let it lapse after a year. They have always been getting disgust confused with fear.

* The Dainty Darling Dove has shoved so much up my rear over the years, there's probably no room at all for anything else. LOL