Or even if he doesn't do it 24 hours ahead, he had

Or even if he doesn't do it 24 hours ahead, he had a bunch of questions ahead of time from registrations that he could just start compiling as Nader is speaking. I am keenly aware when a question is asked multiple times...he doesn't seem to be...and that is the problem. Each time he acts like it is a big surprise "oh wow...we have 500 callers...Nader, how should we handle this?" I have submitted this feedback on their survey multiple times. Get assistants to feed you questions if this is too much work for you to do in realtime. It comes across as very unprofessional. And don't even bother with audio questions if it's too cumbersome and clunky.

That being said, Nader and Dr. Patterson worked well together today. Hopefully they took that positive feedback from the last call and realized that preparing ahead of time can lead to a much more polished act. The last two have been great in terms of coordination. Dr. Patterson gives that perfect amount of technical in the weeds detail and Nader gives the high level overview and updates.

One guest asked a great question on when are we going to be covered by the Fox News, CNNs, etc. I feel like this has been dodged a couple of times now if I am being honest. Dr. Patterson said it was criminal on the last call and Nader basically said "nobody believes us because we are the little guy" on this one. I do wish that they would turn around and engage with their PR firm a bit more on this and hold them accountable. It all comes down to validation. Validation via media (the Fox News, CNNs, etc). FDA (BLA, BTD), big banks (financing deal), big pharma (NASH Deal)...we should be pursuing external validation on all fronts ferociously imo as one will hopefully influence the others.

Anyhow, my .02 We will get there...lots of exciting catalysts in the next couple of weeks!!