So you interpret Mary's deposition different than

So you interpret Mary's deposition different than I do?

Wow, that's a shock. Who would have seen that coming?

You think going after property the Supreme Court has said by upholding a lower Court's decision, belongs to Spain is a solid business model?

Okay, you do. That's great. I don't.

Now, after years of failure and after the CEO claimed they were on the wreck over 3 years ago, you think they need "alleged" cutting edge technology to find treasure?

Okay, but I don't. Current technology works just fine for salvors. They say it's 3D sub bottom profiling, but that's been around for over a decade.

That's the beauty of these forums. Both sides of the equation can share their opinions.

There's nothing positive I see when it comes to Melbourne. I request every report from the state. But you have folks who have a vested interest in SFRX who get emotional when I simply post the reports.

If/when the device is proven to work, and no it doesn't have to find treasure on Melbourne, then I might buy in. I have yet to see anything proven, but someone just posted a $10 price target in another forum. So that peaks my interest.

By contrast, if they announce they found 3 coins it necessarily wouldn't prove the device works. We were told the mask find proved Indy's tech worked, and how'd that work out?

I want to see verifiable proof before buying in. We've been told since July the tech works. You remember, that because you said you would want an explanation when the 90 day target expired.

If you have some actual DD to share, please do. As long as it's not a paid promo.

Thanks much.