So you agree with pnwtri that new posters to the board can’t have opinions that are not 100% supportive of CYDY and NP? That’s seems contrary to the goals of this board which is to maintain a balanced conversation on Leronlimab and CYDY.
I’ve been invested in CYDY longer than 90%+ of the members here and I don’t agree 100% with NP’s approach to some topics (timeline promises, discussing possibilities that never come true, etc.). And that is my right, and the right of others to do and to not be accused of being a short or having a negative agenda. It would be easy to accuse others here of being “pumpers” based on their SP predictions, etc., but we don’t do that because it’s their opinion.
This board looks nothing like iHub. IHub is filled with blatant lies and bashing, some of which is encouraged by members of this board who poke and prod non-CYDY Iinvestors. This board is mostly balanced, with some who see the $500 possibility of leronlimab and that it will cure the first virus on Mars, and others who look at the facts and want to discuss possibilities.
I’ve been invested in CYDY longer than 90%+ of the members here and I don’t agree 100% with NP’s approach to some topics (timeline promises, discussing possibilities that never come true, etc.). And that is my right, and the right of others to do and to not be accused of being a short or having a negative agenda. It would be easy to accuse others here of being “pumpers” based on their SP predictions, etc., but we don’t do that because it’s their opinion.
This board looks nothing like iHub. IHub is filled with blatant lies and bashing, some of which is encouraged by members of this board who poke and prod non-CYDY Iinvestors. This board is mostly balanced, with some who see the $500 possibility of leronlimab and that it will cure the first virus on Mars, and others who look at the facts and want to discuss possibilities.
6
