Who submitted an application on 5/28/19 that claimed "first use in commerce" as early as 5/15/19?
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=s...amp;page=1
Then on 6/5/19 put out this PR?
WILD MANTA TO DEVELOP SEASEARCHER TECHNOLOGY FOR SEAFARER EXPLORATION CORP
https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/wild-mant...tion-corp/
As the Priority Action from the USPTO explains, if they planned on using the mark in future commerce, they could apply for a hold on the mark, which is a different application. But they could prolly just edit the date on the current application and submit an actual specimen, not a cartoon.
But you do remember me asking about the "first use" date, don't you?
I'm starting to think my brilliant DD is really starting to bother some, which is always fun.
Regardless, it's no biggie but many OTC tickers try to put a high value on a trademark. I have even seen patents they've purchased have a value under Goodwill that were astronomical. The reality is they simply bought the technology for an 8 track cassette or something outdated.
I'm sure if/when the mark is obtained some will say it proves the device works or the USPTO wouldn't have issued it.
I'm also curious why they haven't announced a patent pending, especially if their tech is faster and more accurate as the info on the specimen claims.
But they did hire the IP lawyer, so we'll see. Patents are supposed to be one of his specialties.
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=s...amp;page=1
Then on 6/5/19 put out this PR?
WILD MANTA TO DEVELOP SEASEARCHER TECHNOLOGY FOR SEAFARER EXPLORATION CORP
https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/wild-mant...tion-corp/
As the Priority Action from the USPTO explains, if they planned on using the mark in future commerce, they could apply for a hold on the mark, which is a different application. But they could prolly just edit the date on the current application and submit an actual specimen, not a cartoon.
But you do remember me asking about the "first use" date, don't you?
I'm starting to think my brilliant DD is really starting to bother some, which is always fun.
Regardless, it's no biggie but many OTC tickers try to put a high value on a trademark. I have even seen patents they've purchased have a value under Goodwill that were astronomical. The reality is they simply bought the technology for an 8 track cassette or something outdated.
I'm sure if/when the mark is obtained some will say it proves the device works or the USPTO wouldn't have issued it.
I'm also curious why they haven't announced a patent pending, especially if their tech is faster and more accurate as the info on the specimen claims.
But they did hire the IP lawyer, so we'll see. Patents are supposed to be one of his specialties.
1
