Great post by a blogger named Raider. Worth sharing.
Tuesday, 02/25/20 01:31:41 PM
Re: Goldenboy17 post# 60442
Post # of 60448
I asked you to list definitive achievements. Actually, you listed none. Acknowledgment of failures and the wanna be, gonna be excuses. As to your mention of Juno Beach wreck. That was this companies grand launch into the treasure hunting business. Surveyed and extensively worked by a number of professionals long before this bunch of amateurs entered into the picture. The site was proven as a well established looser. But you seem to be eluding to secret survey maps and what are obvious excuses for the companies failure. As to the x-military personnel hired by SFRX. Is that suppose to be impressive? I would think the company would be far more concerned about hiring professional, experienced marine treasure hunters, treasure finders that cold actually contribute to the efforts. I do find it interesting that you, along with others posting here, completely side-step the hard facts regarding why this company fails to find a shipwreck which contained 32 iron cannons which even if scattered, stand out significantly in a marine magnetometer survey. Instead you make reference to administrative egg-heads that regardless of there experience in the technological world, have zero experience in the marine sciences. Sharpen your pencil and try again.
Tuesday, 02/25/20 01:31:41 PM
Re: Goldenboy17 post# 60442
Post # of 60448
I asked you to list definitive achievements. Actually, you listed none. Acknowledgment of failures and the wanna be, gonna be excuses. As to your mention of Juno Beach wreck. That was this companies grand launch into the treasure hunting business. Surveyed and extensively worked by a number of professionals long before this bunch of amateurs entered into the picture. The site was proven as a well established looser. But you seem to be eluding to secret survey maps and what are obvious excuses for the companies failure. As to the x-military personnel hired by SFRX. Is that suppose to be impressive? I would think the company would be far more concerned about hiring professional, experienced marine treasure hunters, treasure finders that cold actually contribute to the efforts. I do find it interesting that you, along with others posting here, completely side-step the hard facts regarding why this company fails to find a shipwreck which contained 32 iron cannons which even if scattered, stand out significantly in a marine magnetometer survey. Instead you make reference to administrative egg-heads that regardless of there experience in the technological world, have zero experience in the marine sciences. Sharpen your pencil and try again.
1
