I sent the following letter via email to Ms. Bear and Mr. Quirk:
Dear Ms. Bear and Mr. Quirk:
As a long-standing shareholder of Health Discovery Corporation (HDC), one who has invested since 2005 and who currently owns almost three times the number of shares held by you, Ms. Bear, I am writing to the two of you to express my outrage at your well-orchestrated and deceptive scheme to call for an emergency shareholder meeting, for the sole purpose of electing a new board that could include one or both of you. Further, both of you owe HDC shareholders an apology for your deceptive actions, and you need to refrain from any additional actions that are designed to hurt the company for your gain.
Obviously, any and all shareholders reserve the right to voice their opinions and concerns, and they also reserve the right to call for a shareholder meeting, regardless of whether said request will be granted. However, the HDC shareholders do not deserve to be deliberately deceived for your personal benefit. The two of you have issued a legal complaint, and presented it via message boards in a manner that deceptively suggests that you, Ms. Bear, innocently just wants a shareholder meeting because you were somehow ‘shocked’ to learn things, and that you, Mr. Quirk, wasn’t involved in the introduction of the information to shareholders via the message boards. To the contrary, it is clear that this was a well thought out strategy and, as I posted previously, I personally believe that you, Mr. Quirk, presented as James on the Yahoo board. Whether I’m right or wrong on this actually doesn’t matter, since here is the more important issue. The person presenting as James didn’t innocently stumble upon the complaint documents via the portal that was clearly created for your intended purposes. In other words, James is obviously an active participant in your scheme to deceive shareholders. Do you know why I know this? Because I personally downloaded two of the documents from the DeKalb County website after reading the HDC 8-k, which was prior to your posting, and paid over $100 for the two documents, given that the charge per page was $0.50. In other words, James isn’t the nice guy you portrayed, as if he or she was so willing to spend personal money just to be ‘helpful’ to other shareholders.
Further, given that this entire process clearly didn’t happen overnight, and was certainly a well-orchestrated process, the time and expense on your part was not insignificant. I know first-hand, based on your emails, Mr. Quirk, that your desire to get back on the board of HDC has been insatiable, and you asked select shareholders on multiple occasions, in 2018 and 2019, to provide you with the number of shares they owned, because this was, your words, ‘important’. Interestingly enough, you wanted changes to the board both prior to and subsequent to the successes which the current team achieved in 2019 with Intel and Neogenomics. Thus, the picture starts to become clearer that you aren’t acting alone, and I am deeply troubled that your efforts are being funded by others who aren’t being appropriately disclosed. Does a group that includes Mr. Kowbel come to mind? That’s right, the Kowbel who ran HDC into the ground.
Ms. Bear, your letter to shareholders that James was presumably so kind to provide, was less-than sincere. As I mentioned in a prior post, you somehow forgot to include some of the information that you included in your complaint, namely that you and Mr. Quirk want access to all past and present shareholders, which is obviously none of your business, and you also want to propose a new slate of directors, which runs contrary to the manner in which you worded your pathetic letter. By the way, Ms. Bear, you have a foul mouth. Your comment to me in a mailbox on the IHUB board was inexcusable, and I certainly don’t want you representing me on the HDC board of directors.
Speaking of message boards, I find it very interesting that over the past few months a number of individuals, and in some cases individuals who have changed their alias multiple times, have popped up. Do you think that’s oddly coincidental, or do you think that has everything to do with your deceptive strategy? You aren’t fooling me, and I believe it is unconscionable that you have purposefully tried to deceive shareholders who might not be paying that much attention. To reiterate, HDC shareholders don’t deserve this.
I am copying the HDC board of directors and, while I have no control over how the board will address this unfortunate scenario, I am asking the members of the board to refrain from ignoring your actions, and instead use every legal resource available to defend the company and protect the interests of shareholders.
Dear Ms. Bear and Mr. Quirk:
As a long-standing shareholder of Health Discovery Corporation (HDC), one who has invested since 2005 and who currently owns almost three times the number of shares held by you, Ms. Bear, I am writing to the two of you to express my outrage at your well-orchestrated and deceptive scheme to call for an emergency shareholder meeting, for the sole purpose of electing a new board that could include one or both of you. Further, both of you owe HDC shareholders an apology for your deceptive actions, and you need to refrain from any additional actions that are designed to hurt the company for your gain.
Obviously, any and all shareholders reserve the right to voice their opinions and concerns, and they also reserve the right to call for a shareholder meeting, regardless of whether said request will be granted. However, the HDC shareholders do not deserve to be deliberately deceived for your personal benefit. The two of you have issued a legal complaint, and presented it via message boards in a manner that deceptively suggests that you, Ms. Bear, innocently just wants a shareholder meeting because you were somehow ‘shocked’ to learn things, and that you, Mr. Quirk, wasn’t involved in the introduction of the information to shareholders via the message boards. To the contrary, it is clear that this was a well thought out strategy and, as I posted previously, I personally believe that you, Mr. Quirk, presented as James on the Yahoo board. Whether I’m right or wrong on this actually doesn’t matter, since here is the more important issue. The person presenting as James didn’t innocently stumble upon the complaint documents via the portal that was clearly created for your intended purposes. In other words, James is obviously an active participant in your scheme to deceive shareholders. Do you know why I know this? Because I personally downloaded two of the documents from the DeKalb County website after reading the HDC 8-k, which was prior to your posting, and paid over $100 for the two documents, given that the charge per page was $0.50. In other words, James isn’t the nice guy you portrayed, as if he or she was so willing to spend personal money just to be ‘helpful’ to other shareholders.
Further, given that this entire process clearly didn’t happen overnight, and was certainly a well-orchestrated process, the time and expense on your part was not insignificant. I know first-hand, based on your emails, Mr. Quirk, that your desire to get back on the board of HDC has been insatiable, and you asked select shareholders on multiple occasions, in 2018 and 2019, to provide you with the number of shares they owned, because this was, your words, ‘important’. Interestingly enough, you wanted changes to the board both prior to and subsequent to the successes which the current team achieved in 2019 with Intel and Neogenomics. Thus, the picture starts to become clearer that you aren’t acting alone, and I am deeply troubled that your efforts are being funded by others who aren’t being appropriately disclosed. Does a group that includes Mr. Kowbel come to mind? That’s right, the Kowbel who ran HDC into the ground.
Ms. Bear, your letter to shareholders that James was presumably so kind to provide, was less-than sincere. As I mentioned in a prior post, you somehow forgot to include some of the information that you included in your complaint, namely that you and Mr. Quirk want access to all past and present shareholders, which is obviously none of your business, and you also want to propose a new slate of directors, which runs contrary to the manner in which you worded your pathetic letter. By the way, Ms. Bear, you have a foul mouth. Your comment to me in a mailbox on the IHUB board was inexcusable, and I certainly don’t want you representing me on the HDC board of directors.
Speaking of message boards, I find it very interesting that over the past few months a number of individuals, and in some cases individuals who have changed their alias multiple times, have popped up. Do you think that’s oddly coincidental, or do you think that has everything to do with your deceptive strategy? You aren’t fooling me, and I believe it is unconscionable that you have purposefully tried to deceive shareholders who might not be paying that much attention. To reiterate, HDC shareholders don’t deserve this.
I am copying the HDC board of directors and, while I have no control over how the board will address this unfortunate scenario, I am asking the members of the board to refrain from ignoring your actions, and instead use every legal resource available to defend the company and protect the interests of shareholders.
