Post by MBMoney - HDC message board Yahoo...50 min
Post# of 302
(Total Views: 228)
Posted On: 02/23/2020 9:23:32 AM
Post by MBMoney - HDC message board Yahoo...50 minutes ago
Neilsen, the bottom line is simple. HDC announced in December that it will be updating its SEC filings, and scheduling a shareholder meeting for no later than end of June. It is that simple for most of us, since we finally have confirmation of where things are headed. However, Mr. Quirk has desperately wanted back on the board for the past several years, and has orchestrated a process to call for an emergency meeting aimed at one thing: to get himself elected. In doing so, he's clearly used others to pop up out of nowhere over the past few months to post negative commentary about the company. If he was forthright, he would have jointly signed the letter to shareholders rather than having 'Cindy' post it. This should now be an issue of deep concern for shareholders, since Mr Quirk's track record as a director speaks for itself. He left the company penniless.
One other note: Cindy closed her letter suggesting that all she wants is a shareholder meeting. That's funny, given that a) we already know one is to be scheduled, and b) she forgot to mention that one of the things she and Quirk asked for in the complaint is a list of all past and present shareholders. If I don't have a need for this information, why should she and Quirk have a need (or a right) to get such information?
Neilsen, the bottom line is simple. HDC announced in December that it will be updating its SEC filings, and scheduling a shareholder meeting for no later than end of June. It is that simple for most of us, since we finally have confirmation of where things are headed. However, Mr. Quirk has desperately wanted back on the board for the past several years, and has orchestrated a process to call for an emergency meeting aimed at one thing: to get himself elected. In doing so, he's clearly used others to pop up out of nowhere over the past few months to post negative commentary about the company. If he was forthright, he would have jointly signed the letter to shareholders rather than having 'Cindy' post it. This should now be an issue of deep concern for shareholders, since Mr Quirk's track record as a director speaks for itself. He left the company penniless.
One other note: Cindy closed her letter suggesting that all she wants is a shareholder meeting. That's funny, given that a) we already know one is to be scheduled, and b) she forgot to mention that one of the things she and Quirk asked for in the complaint is a list of all past and present shareholders. If I don't have a need for this information, why should she and Quirk have a need (or a right) to get such information?
(1)
(0)