he took comments the last time but seemed frustrat
Post# of 153864
(Total Views: 503)
Posted On: 02/11/2020 1:45:48 PM
he took comments the last time but seemed frustrated by the moderator of the program and therefore ended it a little abrupt...this time you could tell NP really wanted to give the impression that he had nothing to hide and was willing to grit his teeth to get to as many questions as possible as the moderator fumbled through them "Are you there? Are you there? OK, next one...Are you there? Are you there?" Grrr...that moderator is cringe worthy and unprofessional in how he runs these. I love the live forum concept and it was KEY given the recent reports questioning everything the company has ever done and how they did it BUT there has to be a better run program.
Thumbs up to NP on this one. It wasn't his most polished presentation in my mind, but it was more about being an open book and sharing as much as he could with us to make sure we were on the same page. It was a good way to shoot down the FUD created by the Culper "Report"
The one question I have is why do we have different test results for the different cancer patients. I understand the MIL as that was a different protocol, but for #1, #3 and #4 why don't we have CTC, CAML, etc. Wouldn't they collect the same data for each patient?
Thumbs up to NP on this one. It wasn't his most polished presentation in my mind, but it was more about being an open book and sharing as much as he could with us to make sure we were on the same page. It was a good way to shoot down the FUD created by the Culper "Report"
The one question I have is why do we have different test results for the different cancer patients. I understand the MIL as that was a different protocol, but for #1, #3 and #4 why don't we have CTC, CAML, etc. Wouldn't they collect the same data for each patient?
(1)
(0)