Expecting probable public ridicule, I'm presenting my new Unified Theory of SFT.
There are 3 issues about the company that I've been thinking about, too much, probably:
1) how will share price ever substantially increase when the re-sellers are rebranding the software and the SFT name won't get out there? I know about the guys who scan the penny sheets, whatever, that would be inches, when we want yards.
2) how will the 3 new patents, if granted, impact current deals? Are they for improvements on current software or for new products?
3) How can Mr Kay simultaneously maintain that we'll be in the black by August, but he can't determine when revenue from current deals will hit the books. This isn't arguing for the sake of arguing, I think reconciling these two ideas might be the crux of the issue.
The only thing I can think of to explain all of the above, is that the company is currently in the process of being sold and should wrap up sometime this summer. The price has been agreed upon, which is how Mr Kay knows about being in the black and share price is irrelevant to the buyer as long as they can see deals and revenues on the books.
If the new patents are for new software, that leaves open the door for a new company with them, BlockSafe, and possibly, Crypto, and us divvying up the proceeds of the sale and, maybe, receiving shares in the new company.
There are 3 issues about the company that I've been thinking about, too much, probably:
1) how will share price ever substantially increase when the re-sellers are rebranding the software and the SFT name won't get out there? I know about the guys who scan the penny sheets, whatever, that would be inches, when we want yards.
2) how will the 3 new patents, if granted, impact current deals? Are they for improvements on current software or for new products?
3) How can Mr Kay simultaneously maintain that we'll be in the black by August, but he can't determine when revenue from current deals will hit the books. This isn't arguing for the sake of arguing, I think reconciling these two ideas might be the crux of the issue.
The only thing I can think of to explain all of the above, is that the company is currently in the process of being sold and should wrap up sometime this summer. The price has been agreed upon, which is how Mr Kay knows about being in the black and share price is irrelevant to the buyer as long as they can see deals and revenues on the books.
If the new patents are for new software, that leaves open the door for a new company with them, BlockSafe, and possibly, Crypto, and us divvying up the proceeds of the sale and, maybe, receiving shares in the new company.
7
