I have 3 predominate issues with his communication

I have 3 predominate issues with his communication:

1) He often sets expectations that are inaccurate.
2) He misuses words, that we then mis-intemperate. This compounds issue #1. (think NBA they have 6 weeks. Then he was irritated that we didn't know the 6 weeks was just a due diligence period. When the inference he made was 6 weeks to convert it to a binding agreement.)
3) He often speaks with excitement and authority about things, but then defines them in subjective terms. (results are amazing!)

I agree that he has improved, I was impressed when in the cancer setting he cited the measurements of tumors, and the actual language used by doctors. However, he struggled with the pronunciation of many words.

Look, I like Nadar, and was never one of these people who wanted him removed. I am simply saying that we would be better off with a spokesperson that EVERYONE can understand. Not just those of us that have been listening to him for 5 years.