Nobody who respects science and evidence takes my
Post# of 123736
I'm open to both the metaphysical and the scientific takes on the 'white light'.
That said, I'm right about St. Peter. By now he's got a laptop and he's none to happy reading your shit.
And it's an open question as to whether my roasts of your posts....like what I did there?....will buy you sufficient indulgences to gain admission and get yourself some wings......not the kind you probably eat way too many of.
They'll be disappointed though, in your trashing of Occam. He's a Franciscan so he's got a leg up on you anyway. And he will surely tear you a new celestial asshole
This will be on YOUR test.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
For each accepted explanation of a phenomenon, there may be an extremely large, perhaps even incomprehensible, number of possible and more complex alternatives.
Since one can always burden failing explanations with ad hoc hypotheses to prevent them from being falsified, simpler theories are preferable to more complex ones because they are more testable.
I call that the 'what about this and this and this conspiracy theory buster'.
Master it and heaven can be yours, or at least a less muddled, much less confused, sojourn to that white light.
Heaven is a 'no building 7 zone'. Signs posted by smokers to remind them why they're where they are there sooner than they hoped.