ITEM 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure As prev
Post# of 302
(Total Views: 208)
Posted On: 01/22/2020 4:32:36 PM
ITEM 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
As previously disclosed in September 2016, Health Discovery Corporation received notification that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) had declared an Interference between Health Discovery Corporation’s pending patent application covering SVM-Recursive Feature Elimination (“SVM-RFE”) and Intel Corporation’s Patent No. 7,685,077, entitled “Recursive Feature Eliminating Method based on a Support Vector Machine”. Prior to 2013, when the America Invents Act (AIA) was enacted, a patent would be awarded to the “first to invent” a claimed invention. An Interference is an administrative proceeding within the USPTO that is used to determine which party was the first to invent an invention that is claimed in two (or more) independently-owned patent applications.
HDC Management issued this on 2/27/2019
On February 27, 2019, the USPTO ruled in favor of Health Discovery
Corporation on the SVM-RFE Patents in the Interference proceeding between Health Discovery Corporation and Intel Corporation. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO issued its decision, finding that Health Discovery Corporation is entitled to claim exclusive rights to the SVM-RFE technology as set forth in the pending patent application that was filed to provoke the Interference. The decision, issued by Administrative Patent Judge James Moore, ordered Intel’s patent to be cancelled. The decision also dismissed Intel’s motions challenging the validity of Health Discovery Corporation’s pending claims and issued patents covering SVM-RFE. Health Discovery Corporation is currently evaluating its options for further action regarding this matter.
___________________________________
We will have a 1 year anniversary in 37 days since the above filing, we just see the continuation of NO deals and lack of action or actions by HDC involving any "Cease and Desist" ...to state the least!
George...our SVM years ago should have made us plenty of money but it didn't put anything in retail shareholders pockets. I gather the same will follow suit involving SVM-RFE. I gather at least us retail holders are lucky to have millions of nothing, right?
As previously disclosed in September 2016, Health Discovery Corporation received notification that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) had declared an Interference between Health Discovery Corporation’s pending patent application covering SVM-Recursive Feature Elimination (“SVM-RFE”) and Intel Corporation’s Patent No. 7,685,077, entitled “Recursive Feature Eliminating Method based on a Support Vector Machine”. Prior to 2013, when the America Invents Act (AIA) was enacted, a patent would be awarded to the “first to invent” a claimed invention. An Interference is an administrative proceeding within the USPTO that is used to determine which party was the first to invent an invention that is claimed in two (or more) independently-owned patent applications.
HDC Management issued this on 2/27/2019
On February 27, 2019, the USPTO ruled in favor of Health Discovery
Corporation on the SVM-RFE Patents in the Interference proceeding between Health Discovery Corporation and Intel Corporation. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO issued its decision, finding that Health Discovery Corporation is entitled to claim exclusive rights to the SVM-RFE technology as set forth in the pending patent application that was filed to provoke the Interference. The decision, issued by Administrative Patent Judge James Moore, ordered Intel’s patent to be cancelled. The decision also dismissed Intel’s motions challenging the validity of Health Discovery Corporation’s pending claims and issued patents covering SVM-RFE. Health Discovery Corporation is currently evaluating its options for further action regarding this matter.
___________________________________
We will have a 1 year anniversary in 37 days since the above filing, we just see the continuation of NO deals and lack of action or actions by HDC involving any "Cease and Desist" ...to state the least!
George...our SVM years ago should have made us plenty of money but it didn't put anything in retail shareholders pockets. I gather the same will follow suit involving SVM-RFE. I gather at least us retail holders are lucky to have millions of nothing, right?
(0)
(0)