I continue to ask this question and that is "why w

Quote:

---

I continue to ask this question and that is "why would someone who supposedly holds no shares in this company spend countless hrs here posting about what a bad idea it is to hold shares in this company.

---

remember Non Retail is used to *controlling* outcomes on OTC targets like PTOI

it is extremely unusual for an OTC target to both outlast NRs' efforts (circa 2009/2010) .. and then do so with an enviable SS .. usually the OTC target
has a blown out I/O .. forcing OTC target into toxic financing and multiple R/S along the way ..

P2O/PTOI by contrast has held 450 *shareholders* .. one of whom is the DTC
the DTC holds every *share* done via open market (brokerages/insurance firms/banks who issue equities yada yada)

that means there are 449 certs .. a number that has held *consistently* since P2O (the company) was wrested back in 2013

so the reason .. embeds of the original crew that illegally manipulated PTOI (and their sub tiers who are constantly fishing for info to trade off of .. btw there are far easier OTC targets to *trade*) haven't vacated the premises .. is because NRs' almost 11 year effort is going to implode with P2O's ability to successfully test Nulixo's 3 separate avenues of feedstock

which is why the events of this week came into play by NR

sickening but not surprising

4kids

What is also unquestionable is that the opinions of some of the posters here is questionable. The NR has consistently posted anything in opinions that are targeted at any possible new shareholder interest in this company.

I continue to ask this question and that is "why would someone who supposedly holds no shares in this company spend countless hrs here posting about what a bad idea it is to hold shares in this company.
I can understand posts from shareholders, people who have money on the line.
However, I suggest that those who post have an interest in this company. Be it that they are long and want the company to succeed or those who are SHORT and want the company to fail.

If they are short they have a great deal to lose if this company is successful.
If indeed someone is SHORT, they have borrowed shares, both legally and also NAKED either way if the company is even mildly successful they stand to lose an enormous amount of money.

Make no mistake everyone here is posting for a reason. I have declared my self as a shareholder and I hope the company succeeds.
Do you want to let someone who is in hopes of this company failing keep you from buying shares in a company that has the possibility of making enormous profits in the new tech world we are in?


Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/633...z6BUqZTJIX