The reason may be that if he "communicated" the wa

The reason may be that if he "communicated" the way some want, it may be he accidently turns on the "light" before he is ready. If a communication happen to determine that he turned on the light, it would force his hand. I am not sure if only financial information can determine if a company is "dark".

Never the less, if Doc gave us more than cripted tweets he would have tipped his hand a long time ago. We can't have it both ways, we know we have an honest, reputable CEO with integrity, a true rarity in penny stocks, a CEO that doesn't "pump" his ticker for a new car. We bought a stock that is legally dark, dark for a reason, don't ask Doc to change his reasoning because we want him to. Again, we bought into a dark stock, remind yourself why. I would be happy if we only got a tweet but he may not be able to even do that right now. All in my opinion.