I have no clue if anyone from Yahoo is watching fo
Post# of 302
(Total Views: 228)
Posted On: 01/11/2020 1:54:27 PM
I have no clue if anyone from Yahoo is watching for posts here but will tell "James" over on Yahoo you are correct that our CEO won't dump millions of shares into the open market simple because that is "not" CEO McGovern style or need even though the differences between .04 and .004 looks good even to me.
This is what basically will transpires if the CEO must first become SEC compliant. Next a possible player or two may license our technologies, mainly the SVM-RFE patents. Other possibilities maybe in the air and perhaps talked about. Where the CEO makes money is for him to now sell a certain amount of his shares, numbers to be determined upon how high he can push the stock verses what players feel they are worth or their potential worth. In order for him to sell a good portion of his shares they must be registered and they can't get registered until we are SEC compliant plus reporting.
That is the normal route however with roughly only 5 years left on the patents in some case we need to really be pushing exposure. I figure in 3-4 years I am afraid I would either ride this company into the sunset day by day or thinking about winding the company up.
OK, If I knew for fact that Intel or another player owed HDC in a big way involving placing our technology into their chips and also where sub licensing.
Is HDC able to file Cease and Desist against Intel or some other corporations.
Our CEO has much to do Unless he just sees HDC as a 40 hours week 9 to 5 venture. What I am saying the retail shareholders are the only investors that have the strongest chance of walking away with nothing. Of course if I could just trade my common shares in for those "D" series I would be very happy.
Could HDC be bought out or the patents be bought? Yes
I doubt any merger at this point or up list is even a fleeing thought.
I may be incorrect but believe we should become SEC compliant before any shareholders meeting. I am certain at this point that the company will either increase or decrease share structure but if not it would seem another reason to just work 9 to5 Monday through Friday and just wait on time to expire.
This is what basically will transpires if the CEO must first become SEC compliant. Next a possible player or two may license our technologies, mainly the SVM-RFE patents. Other possibilities maybe in the air and perhaps talked about. Where the CEO makes money is for him to now sell a certain amount of his shares, numbers to be determined upon how high he can push the stock verses what players feel they are worth or their potential worth. In order for him to sell a good portion of his shares they must be registered and they can't get registered until we are SEC compliant plus reporting.
That is the normal route however with roughly only 5 years left on the patents in some case we need to really be pushing exposure. I figure in 3-4 years I am afraid I would either ride this company into the sunset day by day or thinking about winding the company up.
OK, If I knew for fact that Intel or another player owed HDC in a big way involving placing our technology into their chips and also where sub licensing.
Is HDC able to file Cease and Desist against Intel or some other corporations.
Our CEO has much to do Unless he just sees HDC as a 40 hours week 9 to 5 venture. What I am saying the retail shareholders are the only investors that have the strongest chance of walking away with nothing. Of course if I could just trade my common shares in for those "D" series I would be very happy.
Could HDC be bought out or the patents be bought? Yes
I doubt any merger at this point or up list is even a fleeing thought.
I may be incorrect but believe we should become SEC compliant before any shareholders meeting. I am certain at this point that the company will either increase or decrease share structure but if not it would seem another reason to just work 9 to5 Monday through Friday and just wait on time to expire.
(0)
(0)