IMO, the article could be written more professiona
Post# of 154959
(Total Views: 401)
Posted On: 01/02/2020 11:40:17 AM
IMO, the article could be written more professionally, but the overall information is good.
Based on the pace of enrolling the first patient into the mTNBC trial, it doesn’t seem likely that CYDY will have data from 5 patients be the end of January to file for BTD. NP announced 2 weeks ago that 4-5 more patients were being screened, but we have not heard if any met the criteria. Based on NP’s previous statements, CYDY still needs CTC data and possibly imaging from 3-4 more patients (3 if is MIL is included) to file for BTD (NP said multiple times that he wanted data from 5 patients for BTD). Even if 4 additional patients were enrolled today, the data wouldn’t be ready. Personally, I want CYDY to have the strongest BTD packet as receiving BTD would make a huge difference.
Maybe a couple of those who regularly email NP could send a quick message to him regarding the 3-4 patients mentioned during the conference call in December?
Based on the pace of enrolling the first patient into the mTNBC trial, it doesn’t seem likely that CYDY will have data from 5 patients be the end of January to file for BTD. NP announced 2 weeks ago that 4-5 more patients were being screened, but we have not heard if any met the criteria. Based on NP’s previous statements, CYDY still needs CTC data and possibly imaging from 3-4 more patients (3 if is MIL is included) to file for BTD (NP said multiple times that he wanted data from 5 patients for BTD). Even if 4 additional patients were enrolled today, the data wouldn’t be ready. Personally, I want CYDY to have the strongest BTD packet as receiving BTD would make a huge difference.
Maybe a couple of those who regularly email NP could send a quick message to him regarding the 3-4 patients mentioned during the conference call in December?
(0)
(0)