always telling to see the interest via non investo
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 324)
Posted On: 12/17/2019 8:35:23 AM
always telling to see the interest via non investors .. 
as noted earlier *there*
==================
now if one wanted to *argue* the subject that P2O shouldn't have been wrested
back in 2013 .. or current CEO *installed* and *infused* funds from that point on
have at it .. there is no doubt that some actual P2O investors .. who've been
*invested* at every step of the way from 2009/2010 would have welcomed
doors' shuttered *permanently* in 2013
that is *imo* the set up .. that makes what comes to pass .. after buyer's first
site's funds' convey to P2O .. be so revealing
b4 that (2020) .. all with interest can *report* input on NF activity
thinking outside of the box for the rocks .. what is the value assigned as of April 2019 to a competitor's (private company) first site's install?
how is that site being funded?
which NR entity backed *green bonds*?
what would be the amount (PPS) to get exhausted LT P2O investors to sell
an amount that wouldn't disrespect early original investors .. many of whom
have never sold one share ~ some of whom have never deposited their certs
in any *NR* brokerage firm
what becomes clear (and imo has been obvious for a while now) .. P2O (company)
has numerous options
as noted above .. it all comes down to what gets done on site and what gets filed
the faux *outrage* over current CEO's funding to *outlast* NRs' extortion of a decade back (ripples outward) .. is just that .. bogus
4kids
as noted earlier *there*
Quote:
to put it in even more simple terms
when P2O was finally wrested back from some sabotaging aromatics (Aug 2013)
the most telling sign of an UPSIDE DOWN NR .. was NRs' *handling* of
current CEO's infusion of multiple millions on 9.30.13 .. closing PPS on
9.30.13 was 35c (NRs' last significant illegal manipulation upward
was Jan 2013 when PPS ran from approx mid 70c to 1.49 .. back then
NRs' stress was 1.50 to 1.65) .. as was noted contemporaneously then
any other OTC stock whose CEO had injected $multiple $millions
would have had NR *run* the targeted OTC stock .. instead PTOI went
from 35c on 9.30.13 to 10c on 12.31.13 .. then in case that *effort* eluded
10c was *reset* to 6c in Jan 2014 .. b4 the final *effort* of 2014 .. resetting
6c to 5c to bury the then release of the ACC Executive Summary (Oct 2019)
as has been noted more recently here .. one of the reasons P2O has outlasted
is due to NRs' inability to force P2O into toxic financing .. since P2O was wrested
back .. financing has come from trusted sources .. including the CEO and the BoD
what do all have in common .. they are all successful businessmen in their own right
the irony to all of this is .. intentional or otherwise .. P2O (the company) has outlasted
and sourced buyer/s .. buyer/s who have spent *time* in Euro land where this tech has
been embraced .. more interesting from the US perspective is how a competitor's first
site install is being funded (value of) as has been noted in this very venue since April 2019
anyone really think buyer/s with interest in P2O's tech aren't familiar with either approach
when it comes to PTOI .. NR is already on their knees after that *volume* round last month
and while NR can abusively work PTOI as all actual P2O investors know well .. NRs' efforts
have never had success in parting out *investors* for over a decade (hence the consistent
450~ shareholders since 2013 ~ of which the DTC is *one* shareholder .. snicker)
the only aspect that matters going forward .. is first if the input noted by one buyer bears
fruit .. NF becomes operational again .. and (3) Flagship processes buyer/s feedstock ..
that *fact* will be visible for those with interest to view .. there are at least 4 *locals* who've
indicated a willingness to provide input to this very venue .. second what moves the needle
*imo* for PTOI (stock) is the first buyer/s funds' conveyed to P2O .. that filing forces NR to
face years' worth of *attention and effort* against P2O/PTOI .. and that filing may lead to
yet another 8K that gets early original investors' attention
slow and steady wins this decade old war with a Non Retail entity that has it rigged
and the joy of that for P2O's mgmt and Founder .. is all of it is *known*
==================
now if one wanted to *argue* the subject that P2O shouldn't have been wrested
back in 2013 .. or current CEO *installed* and *infused* funds from that point on
have at it .. there is no doubt that some actual P2O investors .. who've been
*invested* at every step of the way from 2009/2010 would have welcomed
doors' shuttered *permanently* in 2013
that is *imo* the set up .. that makes what comes to pass .. after buyer's first
site's funds' convey to P2O .. be so revealing
b4 that (2020) .. all with interest can *report* input on NF activity
thinking outside of the box for the rocks .. what is the value assigned as of April 2019 to a competitor's (private company) first site's install?
how is that site being funded?
which NR entity backed *green bonds*?
what would be the amount (PPS) to get exhausted LT P2O investors to sell
an amount that wouldn't disrespect early original investors .. many of whom
have never sold one share ~ some of whom have never deposited their certs
in any *NR* brokerage firm
what becomes clear (and imo has been obvious for a while now) .. P2O (company)
has numerous options
as noted above .. it all comes down to what gets done on site and what gets filed
the faux *outrage* over current CEO's funding to *outlast* NRs' extortion of a decade back (ripples outward) .. is just that .. bogus
4kids
(2)
(0)