I don't see the reason or need to name the insuran
Post# of 40989
(Total Views: 454)
Posted On: 11/20/2019 9:20:48 PM
Re: BearDickPunch #38137
I don't see the reason or need to name the insurance company that is now testing our product(s). Serves no purpose, other than detractors possibly making anonymous phone calls to confirm the testing or to call out our CEO with nasty comments. No, it is best to name our NEW CLIENT once a contract is signed.
Again, am I the only one that thinks 60 units for testing is excessive?
To me it means either the fleet is huge, or these units are the first traunch of orders to be delivered, once the "testing" is declared satisfactory and complete.
You do realize, this insurance company is WELL AWARE of what our product(s) does, and that they have already been tested by a third party. That is how we got this initial order (test).
Just sit back and watch!
Again, am I the only one that thinks 60 units for testing is excessive?
To me it means either the fleet is huge, or these units are the first traunch of orders to be delivered, once the "testing" is declared satisfactory and complete.
You do realize, this insurance company is WELL AWARE of what our product(s) does, and that they have already been tested by a third party. That is how we got this initial order (test).
Just sit back and watch!
(5)
(0)On4 Communications (ONCI) Stock Research Links
Sometimes sh*t happens!
Scroll down for more posts ▼