"Manifesto"? *LAUGHING* Far from a "manifest
Post# of 11803
(Total Views: 306)
Posted On: 11/18/2019 1:11:34 PM
"Manifesto"?
*LAUGHING*
Far from a "manifesto", it was...
"pre-condition." That's understood, right?"
Not really,
The precondition stated did not predicate a postcondition.
for example:
Withdrawing money from a debit account in an ATM — preconditions: the sum being withdrawn should be smaller than or equal to the sum remaining on the account and smaller than the sum remaining in the ATM; postconditions: the reminders of money in both ATM and on the account should equal their original values minus the sum being withdrawn.
You wrote:
"The first investment date of October 1, which has been treated as if Berman did something else illegally"
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/632...z65eaybFnz
No, the "investment" is/has not " been treated as if Berman did something else illegally".
Those are your words, not mine.
I am just openly wondering what the postconditions of the "investment" are, as none were presented with the declaration of the "investment".
IF Mr. Berman believed so much as to "invest" without any conditions, the more power to him and I praise him for his belief in the forward movement and success of the company!
JMO
*LAUGHING*
Far from a "manifesto", it was...
"pre-condition." That's understood, right?"
Not really,
The precondition stated did not predicate a postcondition.
for example:
Withdrawing money from a debit account in an ATM — preconditions: the sum being withdrawn should be smaller than or equal to the sum remaining on the account and smaller than the sum remaining in the ATM; postconditions: the reminders of money in both ATM and on the account should equal their original values minus the sum being withdrawn.
You wrote:
"The first investment date of October 1, which has been treated as if Berman did something else illegally"
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/632...z65eaybFnz
No, the "investment" is/has not " been treated as if Berman did something else illegally".
Those are your words, not mine.
I am just openly wondering what the postconditions of the "investment" are, as none were presented with the declaration of the "investment".
IF Mr. Berman believed so much as to "invest" without any conditions, the more power to him and I praise him for his belief in the forward movement and success of the company!
JMO
(2)
(0)