This is what I’ve been hammering ad nauseum. ONL
Post# of 40989
Now the underlying question - WHY does he stubbornly refuse to do one? It should be such an easy process. The increase in share price (should he be telling the truth) would MORE than justify and pay for the cost. There MUST be a non-cost associated reason for avoiding an audit at all costs. My conclusion can only be he’s hiding something and is desperately trying to avoid prison. Why else would a man allow his own name and reputation be completely trashed for a solid year?
If an audit proved only HALF of what he said, this share price shoots to well over .01. I think it goes to .05+ just based on future potential. All we need to see is credibility. The fact that Steve refuses to provide it is troubling.
Whoever says an audit is not needed is a fool. It’s the one and only thing that can instantly save the company.