US to send 'mechanised forces' to Syrian oil field
Post# of 97723
![Avatar](/images/ProfileImages/934136062_182_A_Dawgg 1 Two 10-baggers at the same time..jpg)
Defense secretary said the redeployment was ‘reinforcing
our position’ in the country < > A map included mid-post.
< I say yes give the oil fields to the Kurds.
< While, getting rid of the communists among the Kurds.
![](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/446f478600fbc246f3a93592a45ef4299ed7ddb5/0_0_5760_3456/master/5760.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=15b69664f9fb5402abdee8541ce2ac6f)
Turkey-backed Syrian fighters take over areas on the road between Tal Abyad and Kobane on Thursday, as Kurdish forces in north-eastern Syria left several positions along the long border with Turkey.
Turkey-backed Syrian fighters take over areas on the road between Tal Abyad and Kobane on Thursday, as Kurdish forces in north-eastern Syria left several positions along the long border with Turkey. Photograph: AFP via Getty Images
The US defence secretary has confirmed “mechanised forces” will be redeployed alongside soldiers to protect oil fields in eastern Syria, in a reversal of Donald Trump’s earlier order to withdraw all troops from the country.
Mark Esper told a press conference at Nato headquarters in Brussels that “we are reinforcing our position” in Syria that “will include some mechanised forces” although he tried to insist that the US mission in the country was unchanged.
The goal, the secretary added, was “to deny Isis access to the oil fields” in north-east Syria, although he would not say how many US troops would remain other than to indicate the number would be fewer than 1,000.
![](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2F1s%2F2019%2F10%2F22%2F09%2F20026306-7599355-image-a-34_1571732672873.jpg&f=1&nofb=1)
Minutes earlier, Donald Trump, had tweeted to explain the importance of securing the oil, as part of his agreement with Turkey, which gave the green light for the Turkish president, Racep Tayyip Erdoğan, to launch an invasion to establish a security zone last month.
Esper said the intention was “to strengthen our position at Deir ez-Zor,” most likely at a Conoco gas plant, the site of a February 2018 clash between US special forces and Syrian regime-backed militias fighting with Russian mercenaries.
The bulk of the 1,000 US troops who had been deployed in north-east Syria at the beginning of the month would return home, Esper indicated. “All the other forces would be turned off,” he said.
“It would mean walling off eastern Syria as a US zone,” Aaron Stein, director of the Middle East programme at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Washington, said of the plan to put tanks around the Conoco plant.
“You would have to protect it from the air. You have to supply it and then you have got to protect the road, presumably from Iraq. You can easily see a scenario where we end up with more troops in Syria than we started off with.”
Trump added to the confusion on Thursday by tweeting: “Perhaps it is time for the Kurds to start heading to the oil region!” The remark seemed to endorse a population transfer from the Kurdish areas along the border with Turkey southwards to the almost entirely Sunni Arab area of Deir Ezzor.
Such a mass displacement of Kurds from their homes would fit with Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s plans to resettle north-eastern Syria with Syrian Arab refugees to create a buffer zone against Kurdish insurgents. Kurdish refugees in Turkey are already reported to be subject to forcible deportation.
“The president of the United States is now helping Turkey achieve ethnic cleansing by telling the Kurds to flee their homes,” former US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power said in a comment on Twitter.
On Tuesday, Erdoğan struck a deal with Vladimir Putin on a 30km-deep “safe zone” in which Russian military police and Syrian border guards would oversee the withdrawal of armed Kurdish units from the area.
Such mass demographic changes – carried out at the barrel of a gun – risk prolonging Syria’s multiple-front conflict indefinitely, said Jan Egeland, head of the Norwegian Refugee Council and the UN’s former humanitarian chief.
“This was an area of relative stability, before all of these deals,” said Egeland, who was also the UN’s special adviser on Syria. “We need to remind all of these people with the power and the guns that this is no chessboard. It is a place where people live.”
Egeland said about 180,000 people, half of them children, had been displaced as a consequence of the Turkish incursion. He added that Kurds arriving at overcrowded camps in Iraq said that many more would join the exodus from the north-east but could not afford to pay people-smugglers who charge hundreds of dollars per person.
Egeland said the mass displacement of populations was being brought about as a consequence of “explosive, improvised deals”.
“For many, the move will not be voluntary and they will displacing the original population there. No problems will be solved and new problems will be created,” he said.
The US special envoy for Syria, James Jeffrey, admitted on Wednesday that “a bit more than 100 Isis detainees have escaped” from captivity as a result of the chaos triggered by the Turkish incursion. Trump claimed on the same day that the escaped Isis fighters had been “largely recaptured”. Jeffrey told Congress: “We do not know where they are.”
There was also considerable uncertainty on Thursday of the fate of nearly 70,000 people, almost all women and children in the al-Hawl camp in north-eastern Syria. Some of them are families of Isis fighters, but many are civilians swept up in formerly Isis-run areas.
The UN’s assistant secretary-general for humanitarian affairs, Ursula Mueller, said the situation in the camp was “desperate”. In a warning directed largely to western nations, Mueller said: “Member states have the primary responsibility for their own nationals, and policies and actions that lead to statelessness should be avoided.”
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)