Ron, in addition to mits reply,my post- to which I

Ron, in addition to mits reply,my post- to which I am replying so you can easily catch it- applies logic to the information provided by NNLX re the GBS and UTI studies to flesh out the possibilities-

as noted, its common to have an intial grant request rejected(re the gbs) (which due to the 6 month time frame for a yea or nay would have been july),with suggestions by the nih committee to improve the proposal or address other concerns,which would be heard on the next go around in january?- not sure of the time frame for submission of a modified grant proposal

besides the grant process nnlx noted other gbs and uti fundraising methods were being pursued also,one of which we discovered to be the net revenue approach

due to the always present non-disclosure agreements demanded by nnlx's bigger partners,nnlx faces limitations re how much and when they can disclose something

thus nnlx may not be able to disclose things it wants to disclose at a certain point in time,which has to be taken into consideration in judging what has been disclosed and what has not been disclosed - both as to present activity and past activity