I, for the life of me, cannot figure out why NP an
Post# of 148187
NP regularly references the investment banks that want him to raise money though them -- and he rightfully disregards those offers. They will undoubtedly be significantly in the bank's favor. (That being said, we would have been better off having one of those financings 12-24 months ago vs. the steady decline via the micro raises which have resulted in substantially more dilution than even one of those i-bank raises).
But aside from i-banks, who are not investors, they are just transnational risk managers -- a pharma: VC, private equity, or hedge fund would be a perfect fit for our situation. And they would likely invest at a premium to our current SP (vs. the current discounted ATM raises).
IMO, this is where strong management makes a world of difference (how to raise money and "play the game". Don't forget that ThaiMed had over $1.6B market cap long before the stage we are currently in. And the major differences were: 1) IZ is an inferior product; but 2) they had raised traditional VC and IPO money and had money in the bank; and 3) they had signed their go-to-market sales partner.
Hopefully, the dam will finally break when we announce our go-to-market sales partner.