No kidding the science is solid and in my opinion
Post# of 154804
(Total Views: 623)
Posted On: 09/19/2019 10:40:33 PM
Re: Bored Lawyer #8397
No kidding the science is solid and in my opinion is a guaranteed win with triple digit % increase.
Many of the people on this board, including myself believe that sentiment. But why would you spend everyday bagging on a company (and there would be little to no company without NP) if the "science is solid" as you state. Don't you think all this disdain towards cytodyn and NP alike, is potentially hurting the company which you then claim to be solid? As an investor who believes in the science of the drug and believe its guaranteed, then shouldn't you be trying to push how amazing Cytodyn and NP rather than doing the opposite?
Your actions contradict one another. If you believe in the science so much and believe it is all a 100% guarantee win for you, and all the other BS surrounding NP is irrelevant because that doesn't change the "guarantee" of the science, it only changes the timeframe of "when." That timeframe is not the difference of years, rather 3-6 months maybe. So for something that is such a sure thing who cares about a few extra months? Or if you believe NP has such a negative affect on the company which outweighs the science and you feel he's preventing the future approval and financing, then again....why stay if that's your notion? But to continue hating on NP when you are the one who chooses to invest and chooses to continue to stick around, seems both very exhausting and inhibitory of the end motif being success.
Many of the people on this board, including myself believe that sentiment. But why would you spend everyday bagging on a company (and there would be little to no company without NP) if the "science is solid" as you state. Don't you think all this disdain towards cytodyn and NP alike, is potentially hurting the company which you then claim to be solid? As an investor who believes in the science of the drug and believe its guaranteed, then shouldn't you be trying to push how amazing Cytodyn and NP rather than doing the opposite?
Your actions contradict one another. If you believe in the science so much and believe it is all a 100% guarantee win for you, and all the other BS surrounding NP is irrelevant because that doesn't change the "guarantee" of the science, it only changes the timeframe of "when." That timeframe is not the difference of years, rather 3-6 months maybe. So for something that is such a sure thing who cares about a few extra months? Or if you believe NP has such a negative affect on the company which outweighs the science and you feel he's preventing the future approval and financing, then again....why stay if that's your notion? But to continue hating on NP when you are the one who chooses to invest and chooses to continue to stick around, seems both very exhausting and inhibitory of the end motif being success.
(4)
(0)