By how much revenue they generate
Unfortunately for this poster that is not how patents are valued by CPAs and within the industry. The DECN patents will be valued by the cost to design and produce the technology, test it, and then publish it, at least the public domain information. All costs and fees associate are accrued, until said technology is brought to market. And then when sales begin, the patents valuation will be amortized over I would guess 7 years. Perhaps penny stock traders value them differently. If penny traders, especially angry ones, use a different valuation method then they should explain this to us all. By virtue of the comment at the top, an angry penny trader believes that the patents have zero value until they generate revenue and they have more value based upon the revenue generated. I would ask that the angry penny trader provide a citation(s) for that valuation method. If Mr. Berman is replaced, I would immediately recommend to my new company that they should hire Mr. Berman to manage our future vision, marketing, product development and sales, and the people currently in those positions would bless their lucky stars that they had been saved.
Oh, and one additional thing. Today's news is again not directed to penny traders. IMO the release is not intended to goose the stock. It is yet another release geared toward making the proposed merger partner "take notice" and to value in their own calculus the increased value of the DECN product.
Until DECN CEO Berman is replaced or he dies as is wished by penny traders, this is IMO how the company will be run. Real companies are run this way. Penny scams are run according to the "share price is everything, the only thing" method. If Mr. Berman is replaced then the new CEO can do whatever he wants. And in that regard, I cannot wait.
If DECN wins against J&J on October 2, even if there is no short term ruling, DECN stock should act like it received a huge dose of rocket fuel. I wonder what angry penny traders will say then?
All IMO
Unfortunately for this poster that is not how patents are valued by CPAs and within the industry. The DECN patents will be valued by the cost to design and produce the technology, test it, and then publish it, at least the public domain information. All costs and fees associate are accrued, until said technology is brought to market. And then when sales begin, the patents valuation will be amortized over I would guess 7 years. Perhaps penny stock traders value them differently. If penny traders, especially angry ones, use a different valuation method then they should explain this to us all. By virtue of the comment at the top, an angry penny trader believes that the patents have zero value until they generate revenue and they have more value based upon the revenue generated. I would ask that the angry penny trader provide a citation(s) for that valuation method. If Mr. Berman is replaced, I would immediately recommend to my new company that they should hire Mr. Berman to manage our future vision, marketing, product development and sales, and the people currently in those positions would bless their lucky stars that they had been saved.
Oh, and one additional thing. Today's news is again not directed to penny traders. IMO the release is not intended to goose the stock. It is yet another release geared toward making the proposed merger partner "take notice" and to value in their own calculus the increased value of the DECN product.
Until DECN CEO Berman is replaced or he dies as is wished by penny traders, this is IMO how the company will be run. Real companies are run this way. Penny scams are run according to the "share price is everything, the only thing" method. If Mr. Berman is replaced then the new CEO can do whatever he wants. And in that regard, I cannot wait.
If DECN wins against J&J on October 2, even if there is no short term ruling, DECN stock should act like it received a huge dose of rocket fuel. I wonder what angry penny traders will say then?
All IMO
2
