"Yeah, right. The primary Mod doesn’t even respo
Post# of 1139
Yes. You know it's pretty bad when two of us from the PTOI board sought out the suggestions board for the same reason.
The 4kids moderator has a dishonest agenda to promote the stock. Those who subscribe to her opinions that "colluding entities" destroyed the PTOI stock price, can dilute the PTOI board with wildly off topic posts, like these recent posts about the gold standard ( https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5503149 ) and whether another poster was following someone on the MUX board on IHub ( https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5506679 ).
As I'm someone who doesn't subscribe to that moderator's opinions, the moderator searches for reasons to delete my posts or simply deletes them, I don't know which. As a typical example, my just-deleted post which I posted at the end of this post, conforms to the TOS but was deleted anyway with the esoteric code of '1'. I think '1' means off topic but posters aren't given any description of why their posts are deleted.
In ten years, I've only ever had one of my deleted posts restored by admin. It was one where the 4kids moderator put "Responded to an old post" as an explanation for deletion. The moderator literally has to broadcast that the TOS weren't actually violated before admin restores a deleted post. Since then 4kids has learned that if she just stays silent, she can flout the TOS all she wants and admin won't overturn her deletions.
The problem is that readers have every right to assume that the moderator does the job of a moderator and readers don't see the extreme bias...unless they don't kowtow to the moderator and start seeing their posts deleted for no apparent reason. The moderator does anything but moderate but was given the delete key which she only uses as a weapon to push out anyone who doesn't subscribe to her opinions. The 4kids moderator has no interest in moderating and she subtracts value from the board.
My deleted post below--no TOS violations whatsoever. I'll put it in for review but, as I said, that has been futile.
---
A $19M ghost town at that. PTOI is still trading at a $3M market cap even though there are $16M of accrued liabilities, notes, etc... on the books which would probably need to be paid off before investors see one thin dime of any future profits, profits of which the company hasn't demonstrated any potential to realize in any capacity for over a decade. Yet PTOI still carries a value of effectively $19M with shareholders.
There's also a reason why PTOI isn't telling investors how well the processors produced when running--undoubtedly because it refuses to share poor numbers with investors and PTOI's founder previously found himself facing fraud charges for putting out fake numbers to investors. Both the SEC and the OSC made it clear that fraud charges don't necessarily stop at the company's doorstep, leaving the insiders who perpetrated the fraud unscathed. Ever since, PTOI insider(s) have shied away from putting out blatantly fake numbers and have opted for silence instead. Luckily for the founder, he was never brought up on fraud charges for his claims of making diesel for under $10 per barrel.
PTOI can't run the processors in any worthwhile or useful capacity after over ten years of supposedly trying...but the company says it hopes to eventually find a customer and sell a processor, apparently to some customer who is more of an expert than PTOI at running one of PTOI's processors. Can anyone see the problem with that story?
What exactly would PTOI have to do to lose credibility??
---
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/viewremoved...z5yfDEjLEt